And I have to prove nothing to you, as you have to prove nothing to me. Also if I remember correctly, was slower than BX in some benchmarks. It was at that point my opinion and perspective about VIA chipsets changed. The only really good thing they had to show, was their Vinyl Audio. Collecting, repairing and messing around with old x86 hardware is what I’ve been doing for the past 6 years. And this is something I remember very well, even after 18 years.
|Date Added:||3 August 2007|
|File Size:||19.39 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Also you have to realize that degrees and years of experience means nothing to the other person. We are completely unknown and degrees, experiences and system specs, convince no one. Check out my threads on Vogons marvin section – I benchmarked most slot 1 and socket chipsets last summer.
Download Motherboard ABIT VH6T drivers and software.
I do wonder if VIA will maintain their license in the future; Intel and AMD have a bunch of cross-licensing of x86 patents that keep them dependent on each other. The big problem with VIA chipsets, especially the first revisions, zbit the memory bandwidth. It is by no means a fast chipset unless you compare it with socket 7 machines. Sorry, but I know what I have seen back then.
With a fast AGP 4x card, the performs horribly. These chips could realistically be touted as low-cost alternatives to Intel “Gemini Lake” SoCs, although Zhaoxin is making bold claims about its performance nearing that of AMD Ryzen processors.
It was at that point my opinion and perspective about VIA chipsets changed. I know what I have seen back then. Don’t get me wrong.
ABIT VH6T, Socket 370, Intel Motherboard
I mean, I have seen in the past people posting BS not in this forum and after they where getting ridiculed from many members, they where throwing degrees all over the place in a final effort to defend themselves. VIA had a bad name because it was underperforming compared with chipsets from Intel. Post benchmarks to prove you claims.
Anyway, prove your claims before calling my benchmarks wrong. VIA and Zhaoxin have been co-developing the ZX family of x86 processors for rollout inand at least on paper, the chips vh6g to have the chops to take on Intel’s “Gemini Lake” SoCs.
ABIT VH6T Drivers
I managed to clock one of my 1. Also if I remember correctly, was slower than BX in some benchmarks. I don’t have a time machine. VIA was great as long as there was no competition to show it’s chipsets weaknesses in performance.
Abit VH6T Motherboard Sound card – Questions (with Pictures) – Fixya
Every game and testing suite used rendered scores that were equal to or very near identical scores. I just knew someone will say VIA is Cyrix Granted, VIA isn’t exactly a significant competitor. It’s true, both from a practical perspective and a legal one. The BX was only one thing, and that is stable. VIA has no such thing to hedge in on the duopoly. And I’m not the only one that came to these results – there are similar threads on amibay, vogons and computerhistory forums.
Both of those statements do not dontroller with real world testing and benchmarks of the time. There was also the CPU cache latency issue with thebut since it was designed to run socket chips with on die cache, it’s not really an issue.
While the older chips were built on the 28 nm process, the KX series will be built on the newer 16 nm process, feature 4 or 8 CPU cores clocked at speeds of up to 3. The only really good thing they controllr to show, was their Vinyl Audio.
Look, don’t get me wrong.
They had performance problems with their memory vh6tt that where fixed with the A versions in both cases. The replacement was a board with VIA chipset.
On the other hand there where more than one chipsets, but I don’t remember how much better BX was compared to the other versions.